Carbon dating oops Military sex chat rooms no sign uo
The dramatic example of the "Limestone Cowboy" immediately communicates the truth of the matter.Fossilization proves nothing about long periods of time. [edit on 24-4-2005 by gothica91] It might be a misconception some hav e but I was never taught in school that if something was fossilized it was old.
This is gonna turn into one of those threads where all the bible nutjobs come out to play." i am not a nutjob just because i choose to believe in a higher power, and that the bible is correct.
Now people are working off of Byrd's comments as though they are now established fact. By all means spill the beans we want to heard from your sources.....far hers is most reasonable.
Immediately Gothica91's sources are thrown into question because it's not what people want to hear. Not yet, and I don't even know if what Byrd is saying is false.
It's cut from another site that's full of ridiculous claims.) Don't try this one at home, folks, because you'll feel embarrassed if you encounter someone up on their science. So this isn't a fossil, and the word has gotten out to most of the Biblical and Creationist sites (who acknowledge that it's not a fossil.) However, there are a few who persistantly refuse to understand what fossils really are and try to use it as a refutation of geological processes.
The "creation science museum" has been caught faking a lot of things, including the "Paluxy Man Track" (a carving of a footprint that they tried to pass off as a real footprint in stone.) Most of the creationists have now distanced themselves from it.
perhaps dinasaur fossils are only a few thousand years old.